Where we can check an applicant's registration

Published weekly rather than live, so a very recent registration or revocation may not appear yet.

Covers companies, non-profit associations and foundations. The official record carries officers' personal identification codes; those are discarded rather than stored.

A Crown Dependency with its own registry, not a UK register. One portal spans several sub-registers and the number's prefix says which: CH a charity, NP or NPO a non-profit, FND a foundation, CMP a company, LP a partnership. An NR number is a name reservation rather than an organisation, and is reported as such instead of as a missing entity. Standing distinguishes default, winding up, dissolution and succession.

Officers with their positions and governing body, which annual reports have been filed, and a standing that separates liquidation from reorganisation. The Register of Enterprises covers several registers at once — associations and foundations are the usual Latvian NGO forms and share a number space with companies, so read the entity type rather than assuming.

Trustees and regulatory flags are requested explicitly. Accounts-basis rules differ by legal form — a non-company charity below the threshold using receipts-and-payments is exercising a legal option, not a compliance gap.

The company register, not a charity one — a charitable company appears here, but its charity status and trustee duties sit with the Charity Commission.

This is the companies register — right for a company limited by guarantee, which is the usual Zambian NGO form, but an organisation registered only under the NGO Act with the Registrar of NGOs will not appear.

KBO/BCE registers every Belgian legal entity, so it covers a VZW/ASBL non-profit as well as a company — the legal form on the record is what tells them apart. It names directors and reports both status and legal situation, and it distinguishes a number that was never issued from one that fails its check digits, so a typo is not reported as "not registered".

Non-profit legal entities were merged into the commercial register in 2018, so one source covers Bulgarian NGOs and companies alike, and the non-profit records are the richer of the two. Standing separates a struck-off entity from one winding up, and names a successor where there is one.

Croatian associations are registered separately, so this covers only legal persons in the Court Register. Representatives are counted, not named.

The published export excludes companies whose registration was cancelled, so absence is never proof of non-existence or of a clean strike-off.

Alongside status and real income and expenditure figures, this returns the אישור ניהול תקין (proper-management certificate) year by year — the signal an Israeli funder actually asks for, since most public funding is conditional on holding one. A failed certificate query is reported as unknown rather than as none held. Amuta numbers begin 58; a 51-prefixed number is a public-benefit company under a different registrar.

A Crown Dependency with its own regulator — this is not one of the UK registers, and a Jersey charity will not appear in the Charity Commission's. Covers registered Jersey charities only, and publishes annual-return status alongside registry status.

An official OData feed with deregistration dates and reasons — one of the more complete negative signals available anywhere.

The richest governance data of any registry in the catalogue — named governing members and key officers, plus charity and IPC status with validity dates.

Company data with revocation and suspension dates, plus the responsible person. It cannot speak to foundation, association, charity or fundraising-permission status.

Scottish audit thresholds differ from England and Wales — do not apply the £1m figure to an OSCR-registered charity.

Northern Irish thresholds track Scotland's rather than England and Wales'.

By far the deepest financial data in the catalogue — the full 990 series, plus computed months-of-cash, programme-expense and fundraising-efficiency ratios. Board members are counted, not named.

Registration validity is date-bounded — check validUntil rather than assuming a listed NGO is current.

Every Brazilian legal entity resolves here, so there is no charity/company split to reconcile. Awards are also screened against the CEPIM, CEIS and CNEP debarment lists.

The NIT is usually written with a check digit after a hyphen. That digit is a checksum rather than part of the identifier, and is not treated as one.

Tax registration and compliance flags only. The National Registry extract remains the corporate registration source of record.

Collates the underlying public registers, covering public-benefit companies, foundations and associations.

Carries several independent status fields — trade-register status, business-ID status and 'situations' such as bankruptcy — which must be read together.

Establishes legal-unit existence, administrative status, the association flag and the RNA identifier. It does not expose governing documents or filings.

Four fields only. Results are published in Georgian even from the English page.

Licence-based: check the expiry date rather than treating a listing as evidence of a current licence.

FCRA is a gate, not one check among several: an Indian organisation may only receive foreign money if it holds live FCRA registration, and only about 14,400 do. This queries the active register, so a hit is evidence of current clearance. A miss is not — the cancelled and lapsed lists were withdrawn in 2022, so absence is reported as "not on the active register", never as "not FCRA-registered".

A corporate-number verification. It is not a charity, NPO-corporation, tax, accounts or governance register.

Covers organisations registered with the NGO Regulatory Authority only.

Enrolment is the whole answer here: the register is published as two lists, enrolled and cancelled, rather than as a status field, and those two are the entire register. It covers enrolled voluntary organisations, so a Maltese body that never enrolled is simply outside it.

Keyed on the RFC, and one of the few registers that answers in both directions: SAT publishes the authorised donees and, separately, those whose authorisation was revoked, cancelled or allowed to lapse, with effective dates. Authorisation to issue tax-deductible receipts is the question it settles — it covers organisations and trusts holding that status, not every Mexican nonprofit.

The weekly publication is the current ANBI list, so an entry means the public-benefit designation is live today. It is a tax determination, not a corporate register — this is not the KVK, and plenty of sound Dutch bodies hold no ANBI status at all, so absence is not adverse.

Carries the flags that matter for diligence — voluntary-register and foundation-register membership, bankruptcy, liquidation and compulsory dissolution.

Taxpayer status and fiscal-address condition. APCI registration as an NGO for development is a separate check.

ACRA-registered entities only. Societies registered with the ROS and charities under the Commissioner of Charities are absent, so a miss is never proof of non-registration.

The free ePRS interface needs an account and the full restPrsInfo integration is a paid contract, so this uses the open eNO publication instead.

Searched by name and disambiguated by registration number rather than keyed directly.

Name-matched with a similarity score, so a weak match needs a human read before it is treated as identity confirmation.

Evidence that an organisation appears in the central public-recipient register. It is not the SII tax authority and does not prove tax standing.

Board terms are published, but no current-status field is. org-id.guide has no DIRRSAC list, so 360Giving export omits Honduras rather than emitting a wrong-scheme identifier.

The NGO reporting register, not the register of legal existence. It records approved annual reports — which periods were filed, and whether they were filed on time — and names the director, but it publishes no dissolution status. Evidence of active reporting rather than of legal standing; the Ministry of Justice register is a separate question.

Includes the public-benefit-organisation flag and the representation body. KRS numbers are ten digits and leading zeroes are significant.

A national directory that names members and their positions, but publishes no status or licence field — so it establishes who is involved, not whether the body is in good standing.

Current and former statutory members are both published. Matching is exact on the IČO, and an unreachable register is reported as unavailable rather than as a negative result.

Keyed on the CUIT, and covers civil associations, foreign civil associations, foundations and simple associations — not every Argentine legal entity. No current-standing field is published.

The Identification table carries no revocation or suspension field. Absence and standing questions must be treated as unresolved, never as an adverse finding.

The published table is a registration number and a name, nothing else — no legal status, annual return, accounts, board or governing documents.

No current-status field is published in the snapshot.

A registration number and a name. Nothing published about status, renewal, governance or accounts.

Publishes recent-registration flows, not a current standing register. It cannot show that an older organisation is absent, inactive or dissolved, and its ledger reference is a book location rather than an organisation identifier.

RUNTS covers registered third-sector entities (ETS), not every Italian nonprofit. The public search matches on organisation name rather than the fiscal code, so a result narrows the field rather than confirming identity — the section and status it returns still have to be read against a namesake risk.

An adverse-only check: the dissolved and struck-off lists are public, the ordinary entity search is not. It reports an identifier appearing on those lists, and never reads absence as good standing.

Only registration number, name and address are published openly; fuller detail is not. Corroborates NPO Directorate registration alone — CIPC company registration is a separate question.

A Business Registration Number is recognised and validated, but no automated check runs against it: the Companies Registry's published data could not be shown to give a truthful answer, and a check that guesses is worse than none. Diligence falls back to web research.