The Economics of Grant Administration
Costs, efficiency and value—how to invest in processes that save time and improve outcomes.
By Plinth Team
The Economics of Grant Administration
Strong processes cost less than weak ones—time saved, errors avoided and better outcomes easily outweigh tool spend.
- Manual admin hides significant staff costs.
- Risk and reputation costs are real but invisible.
- AI reduces heavy text work across the lifecycle.
Calculating true cost
Look beyond licences.
- Hours per application and decision.
- Reporting effort and audit prep time.
- Rework from errors and missing records.
Key takeaway: measure before and after improvements.
Investing where it pays back
Prioritise steps with the biggest gains.
- Eligibility triage and due diligence automation.
- Reviewer workflows and feedback drafting.
- Monitoring and impact dashboards.
Key takeaway: Plinth returns value quickly.
Making the case internally
Show evidence to secure budget.
- Pilot a programme and publish results.
- Gather staff and applicant feedback.
- Align savings to strategic goals.
Key takeaway: decisions follow data and user experience.
FAQs
Do small grants justify investment?
Yes with light tiers; admin time dominates otherwise.
How fast is payback?
Often within the first round post‑implementation.
What about sunk costs in legacy tools?
Consider ongoing maintenance vs future flexibility.