Grant Budget Management: Financial Planning and Tracking
Comprehensive guide to managing grant budgets, including planning, allocation, tracking, and financial reporting.
Grant Budget Management: Financial Planning and Tracking
Strong budget management ensures funds reach frontline delivery while keeping trustees confident and auditors satisfied.
- Plan clearly: Align costs to outcomes and set funding conditions you can monitor.
- Track accurately: Reconcile commitments and payments; maintain a single source of truth.
- Report simply: Convert financial data and narrative updates into insight for boards and donors.
Building a grant budget
Define the funding envelope and acceptable cost categories up‑front. Ask applicants to map costs to activities and outcomes. Typical categories include staff costs (salaries, NI, pensions and sessional staff), delivery costs (venue hire, travel, equipment and materials), overheads (rent, utilities, insurance and IT), evaluation (data collection tools or an external evaluator) and a modest contingency for inflation and risk. Request simple evidence such as role descriptions with full‑time equivalent, quotes for large purchases, a method for overhead allocation and a short evaluation plan.
Commitments, payments and variations
Maintain a ledger of grant commitments, scheduled payments and any conditions. Track changes formally via a variation process so totals remain correct.
Monitoring spend against outcomes
Ask grantees to report against the budget headings you funded. For multi‑year grants, request a short forecast with each update. Where possible, match finance lines to outcomes so cost‑effectiveness can be seen across the portfolio.
How Plinth helps
Plinth links budgets to milestones, tracks payments and conditions, and reads narrative reports to summarise outcomes alongside spend. Boards get clear dashboards; grantees get simpler forms. If you already use other finance tools, Plinth can import data and keep everything in sync.
Talk to us about budget tracking in Plinth
Frequently asked questions
What payment schedules work best?
Milestone‑based schedules (e.g., 40/40/20) tied to deliverables balance cashflow for grantees with assurance for funders.
Should we fund overheads?
Yes, where justified and proportionate. Clarify your policy and apply consistently to avoid under‑resourcing delivery.
How do we handle underspend?
Agree a variation early – reprofile, extend delivery or return funds. Keep the audit trail in your system. Plinth records approvals and changes.
What’s the easiest way to report budget vs outcomes?
Use the same headings in reports as in the approved budget; Plinth aligns these automatically and presents clear summaries.
Citations and trusted sources
- Charity Commission: Internal financial controls (CC8) –
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/internal-financial-controls-for-charities-cc8
- Charity SORP resources –
https://www.charitysorp.org/
About the author
Prepared by the Plinth Editorial Team, drawing on implementations with UK foundations and local authorities. Updated August 2025.