Fraud Prevention in Digital Grantmaking

Preventing fraud combines proportionate checks, automation and clear audit trails—without penalising honest applicants.

• Verify identity and bank details before payment.
• Monitor anomalies across applications and spend.
• Record investigations and outcomes.

Prevention first

Most issues are avoided by standard controls applied consistently.

• Eligibility checks, document validation and sanctions screening.
• Dual approval for changes to payee details.
• Segregation of duties and limited access.

Key takeaway: basics close most gaps.

Detection and response

Use signals to focus attention and escalate proportionately.

• Duplicate details, reused text and unusual spending patterns.
• Case notes and evidence for each investigation.
• Clear escalation routes and board reporting.

Key takeaway: Plinth supports transparent, reviewable actions.

Collaboration with partners

Where lawful, share patterns and advice across the sector.

• Red‑flag libraries and joint guidance.
• Coordinated responses for serial risks.
• Respect data protection and due process.

Key takeaway: collaboration strengthens protection for everyone.

FAQs

Will stronger checks slow us down?

Not with automation; standard steps often save time overall.

Do we need a whistleblowing route?

Yes—provide clear, confidential channels.

How do we avoid overreach?

Apply proportionate checks and explain reasons to applicants.