eCivis (EUNA Grants) Review: Government Grant Management Software

eCivis — rebranded to EUNA Grants as part of a broader government technology consolidation — is a cloud-based platform designed specifically for government agencies managing grant programmes. Unlike general-purpose grant management tools, eCivis was built around the operational and compliance realities of the US government grants landscape: agencies receive federal funding, must comply with Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), distribute sub-grants to local organisations, and report to federal oversight bodies.

The platform serves both sides of the government grant equation. Agencies using eCivis as federal funding recipients can track obligations, monitor compliance with federal requirements, and manage reporting cycles. Agencies using eCivis as grantmakers can manage the distribution of funds to sub-recipients — local governments, nonprofits, and community organisations — through a grantee-facing portal.

This dual capability — supporting both grant receipt and grant distribution within a government compliance framework — is eCivis's defining feature and primary market differentiator. It is also the reason the platform is largely irrelevant outside the US government grants context. UK local authorities, UK government departments, and UK-based funders will find that the compliance framework, terminology, and regulatory references embedded throughout eCivis map precisely to US federal requirements, and not at all to the UK public sector funding environment.

What is eCivis (EUNA Grants)?

eCivis is a cloud-based grant management platform originally built for and used by US government agencies. In recent years, eCivis was acquired as part of a government technology consolidation and rebranded under the EUNA Solutions umbrella as EUNA Grants. The underlying platform and its focus on the government grants space remain consistent.

The platform serves a specific and important segment of the grants market: government agencies that both receive federal funding and distribute that funding as sub-grants to local organisations. A US state health department receiving federal public health funding, for example, might use eCivis both to track its compliance with federal grant conditions and to manage the sub-grants it distributes to county health departments and community clinics.

This dual-use model — grant recipient and sub-grantmaker in one system — is common in the US government sector and less commonly supported as a native capability in commercial grant management platforms designed for foundations.

What are eCivis's key features?

Federal compliance monitoring: eCivis is built around Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200), the US federal framework governing how agencies must manage federal awards. The platform provides compliance tracking, audit readiness tools, and documentation management aligned to these requirements. For US agencies that are regularly subject to federal audit, this is a meaningful operational capability.

Grant-seeking and discovery tools: eCivis includes tools to help government agencies search for and track federal funding opportunities. Grant seeking and opportunity tracking are features that most grant management platforms — designed for grantmakers, not grant recipients — do not include.

Financial tracking and budget management: The platform provides tools to track grant budgets, expenditure against awards, and financial reporting to federal sponsors. Budget monitoring with federal reporting requirements built in is a core part of the product.

Grantee management portal for sub-grants: When agencies distribute sub-grants to local organisations, eCivis provides a portal through which sub-recipients submit progress reports, financial updates, and compliance documentation. This sub-recipient management functionality reflects the realities of how federal funding flows through government systems.

Federal reporting: eCivis supports the reporting formats and schedules required for federally funded programmes, including compliance with federal reporting systems and timelines.

What are eCivis's limitations?

US-only regulatory context: Every aspect of eCivis's compliance framework is built around US federal requirements. Uniform Guidance, federal reporting forms, US fiscal year conventions, and US government terminology are embedded throughout the platform. This is entirely appropriate for the platform's intended audience — and entirely inappropriate for UK public sector funders, European government agencies, or any organisation operating outside the US federal grants system.

Not suitable for foundations or corporate funders: eCivis is designed for government agencies managing federally funded programmes. It is not a general-purpose grant management platform for foundations, trusts, or corporate giving teams. The product architecture, workflow assumptions, and compliance tools are specific to government grant administration and would require significant misapplication to serve a non-government grantmaker.

Government procurement processes: Purchasing eCivis typically involves government procurement procedures — RFP processes, government contract vehicles, and procurement timelines that do not apply to private sector buyers. For organisations evaluating grant management software outside government, this adds friction to even initial evaluation.

Implementation timeline: A two-to-four month deployment is typical, which should be factored into planning for agencies that need to be operational quickly.

Pricing opacity: eCivis pricing is custom and obtained through a sales process. Government procurement pricing may be available through relevant contract vehicles, but is not published publicly for general evaluation.

Who is eCivis best suited to?

eCivis is suited to a specific audience:

• US state, county, and local government agencies managing federally funded programmes — particularly those that must demonstrate compliance with Uniform Guidance.
• Tribal governments that receive and distribute federal funding under programmes such as those administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs or Indian Health Service.
• Quasi-governmental bodies managing federal pass-through funding to community organisations.
• US public institutions that need to track both grant receipts and sub-grant distributions under a single compliance-oriented system.

eCivis is not suited to:

• UK local authorities, UK government departments, or devolved administration bodies — different regulatory framework.
• UK or European foundations, trusts, and corporate funders.
• Any organisation operating primarily outside the US federal grants ecosystem.
• Small or private sector funders looking for a cost-effective grant management solution.

How does eCivis compare to the UK public sector context?

This is perhaps the most important point for readers evaluating eCivis from a UK perspective: the platform is not designed for, and does not map to, the UK public sector grants environment.

UK local authorities and government departments operate under a fundamentally different regulatory and funding framework. Key differences include:

• Regulatory bodies: UK public sector funders are subject to UK Charity Commission oversight (where funding charities), Cabinet Office grant standards, and HM Treasury guidance. None of these are addressed by eCivis's US-centric compliance tooling.
• Compliance framework: There is no UK equivalent of Uniform Guidance (2 CFR 200). UK public sector grant management is governed by the Grants Standard published by the Cabinet Office, the DLUHC Community Renewal Fund framework for local authorities, and sector-specific guidance from departmental sponsors.
• Grantee verification: UK funders typically need to verify applicant organisations against the Charity Commission register, Companies House, and OFSI's sanctions list — none of which are built into eCivis.
• Data residency: UK public sector data handling requirements typically demand UK-hosted data storage and compliance with UK GDPR. eCivis, designed for the US market, does not provide these assurances as standard.

For UK public sector funders — including local authorities distributing grant funding to community organisations, Combined Authorities managing investment funds, or government departments running grant programmes — the appropriate technology choices are platforms built for the UK context.

How does eCivis compare to alternatives for public sector grantmakers?

Amplifund is eCivis's closest US-market competitor, also focused on government grant compliance and sub-recipient management. Both platforms serve the US government grants ecosystem well. Neither is appropriate for UK public sector funders.

For UK local authorities distributing grants to community organisations and charities — a common requirement for councils administering community infrastructure levy funds, public health grants, or community resilience grants — a platform built for the UK regulatory context provides both the compliance tooling and the grantee verification capabilities that US-centric platforms cannot offer.

Plinth, for example, includes built-in Charity Commission verification, Companies House checks, and OFSI sanctions screening as standard features, along with full grant lifecycle management — from application intake through assessment, grant agreements, and monitoring. This is the compliance environment UK public sector funders actually operate in.

What should UK public sector funders use instead?

UK local authorities, Combined Authorities, and government departments distributing grants need platforms that understand the UK regulatory environment rather than the US federal one.

Key requirements for UK public sector grantmakers include:

• Verification of applicant organisations against the Charity Commission register and Companies House
• OFSI sanctions screening for grant recipients
• Compliance with UK GDPR and data residency requirements
• Grant agreement management with appropriate audit trails
• Monitoring and reporting workflows calibrated to UK funder expectations
• Integration with UK government systems and reporting frameworks

These requirements point toward UK-built or UK-configured grant management platforms rather than US government technology. For UK public sector funders with large application volumes, AI-assisted due diligence and application assessment can significantly reduce the administrative burden on programme teams. See our guide to automating due diligence in grantmaking for more detail on what this involves in practice.

FAQ

What is the difference between eCivis and EUNA Grants?

eCivis rebranded to EUNA Grants following an acquisition as part of a broader government technology consolidation under the EUNA Solutions brand. The underlying platform, its focus on US government grant compliance, and its core feature set remain consistent. The name change reflects corporate consolidation rather than a fundamental product change.

Does eCivis handle sub-grants?

Yes. Sub-grant management is one of eCivis's core capabilities. Government agencies that receive federal funding and distribute sub-grants to local organisations can manage both sides of this relationship within the platform — tracking their compliance as federal award recipients and managing their responsibilities as sub-grantors.

Can eCivis be used for foundation grant management?

eCivis is not designed for foundation grant management. The platform's architecture, compliance tooling, and workflow assumptions are built around US government grant administration. Foundations would find that the product imposes government-specific requirements and terminology that do not apply to private philanthropic grant programmes. Dedicated grant management platforms for foundations provide significantly better-suited functionality.

Is eCivis suitable for UK local authorities?

No. eCivis is built around US federal compliance requirements (Uniform Guidance / 2 CFR 200) that have no direct equivalent in the UK public sector. UK local authorities need platforms that address UK regulatory requirements — including Charity Commission verification, Companies House checks, OFSI sanctions screening, and UK GDPR compliance — which eCivis does not provide.

What alternatives to eCivis should UK government funders consider?

UK public sector funders should look at grant management platforms built for the UK regulatory environment. These provide the compliance tools relevant to the UK context — Charity Commission and Companies House verification, OFSI screening, UK GDPR-compliant data handling — rather than US federal compliance tooling. For AI-assisted grant management with built-in UK compliance, see the Plinth features page.

How long does eCivis implementation take?

Implementation typically takes two to four months. Government procurement processes often add time before implementation begins. For government agencies with specific programme start dates, the full timeline from procurement initiation to operational use should be planned carefully.

How is eCivis priced?

eCivis pricing is custom and obtained through a sales process. Government procurement may be available through relevant contract vehicles. Pricing is not published publicly.

Recommended next pages

• Grant Management Systems Compared: Fluxx, Submittable, Foundant, SmartSimple and More — Side-by-side comparison of major platforms in the market
• Grant Management for Public Sector Funders — A guide to the specific requirements of public sector grantmakers in the UK
• How to Automate Due Diligence in Grantmaking — What UK funders need from compliance and verification checks
• AI for Funders: The Future of Grantmaking — AI capabilities to look for when evaluating grant management platforms
• Best Grant Management Software for UK Funders 2026 — A ranking of platforms suited to UK grantmakers

Last updated: February 2026