Governance and Trustee Duties

What governance means in a charity context, the legal duties of trustees, and what good governance looks like in practice.

By Plinth Team

TL;DR Governance is the system by which a charity is directed, controlled, and held to account. Trustees carry personal legal duties — compliance, prudence, and care — that cannot be delegated away. Good governance is not about paperwork; it is about ensuring the charity serves its beneficiaries effectively and lawfully. Most governance failures stem from boards that are too passive, too dominant, or too conflicted to do their job properly.

Why this matters

Every charity in England and Wales is overseen by a board of trustees who are ultimately responsible for everything the organisation does. This is not a ceremonial role. Trustees can be held personally liable if the charity breaks the law, loses money through negligence, or fails to protect vulnerable people. The Charity Commission investigates hundreds of governance failures each year, and the consequences range from regulatory action to public disqualification.

Understanding governance is essential whether you are a trustee, a member of staff, or someone working with charities. It shapes how decisions get made, how money gets spent, and how accountable the organisation is to the people it exists to serve.

The 5 things to know

1. Governance means ultimate responsibility for the charity

Governance is not management. It is the framework of authority, accountability, and decision-making that sits above day-to-day operations. In a charity, the governing body — usually called the board of trustees — has collective responsibility for the organisation's purpose, strategy, finances, and compliance with the law. The board does not run the charity's programmes or manage its staff (that is the executive's job), but it must ensure those things are done properly.

2. Trustees have three core legal duties

The Charity Commission's guidance CC3 (The Essential Trustee) sets out three overarching duties:

  • Duty of compliance: Trustees must ensure the charity complies with its governing document (constitution, articles, or trust deed), charity law, and all other relevant legislation. Ignorance is not a defence.
  • Duty of prudence: Trustees must protect the charity's assets and ensure they are used only to further the charity's purposes. This includes proper financial controls and avoiding undue risk.
  • Duty of care: Trustees must act with reasonable care and skill in their decision-making. If a trustee has particular expertise (say, in finance or law), they are held to a higher standard in that area.

These duties are owed to the charity and its beneficiaries, not to the trustees themselves or to any external funder or partner.

3. The Charity Governance Code sets the benchmark for good practice

The Charity Governance Code, updated in 2025, is voluntary but widely used as the sector benchmark. It covers eight principles:

  1. Foundation — the board understands its role, legal requirements, and the principles that underpin good governance.
  2. Organisational purpose — the board is clear about the charity's aims and ensures everything it does supports them.
  3. Leadership — the board sets the tone and provides strategic direction.
  4. Ethics and culture — the board acts with honesty, avoids conflicts of interest, and fosters an open and accountable culture.
  5. Decision-making — the board takes informed, timely decisions based on evidence and sound judgement.
  6. Managing resources and risks — the board ensures resources are managed responsibly and risks are identified and mitigated proportionately.
  7. Equity, diversity, and inclusion — the board reflects and serves the communities the charity works with.
  8. Board effectiveness — the board has the right mix of skills, experience, and diversity, and reviews its own performance.

The Code applies a "comply or explain" approach — charities are encouraged to follow it but can justify departures where appropriate.

4. The board and the executive have distinct roles

One of the most common sources of governance trouble is confusion about who does what. In principle:

  • The board sets strategy, approves budgets, monitors performance, ensures compliance, and hires (and if necessary fires) the chief executive.
  • The executive (CEO and senior staff) manages the organisation, delivers services, employs staff, and implements the board's strategy.

In practice, these boundaries blur — particularly in small charities where trustees may also volunteer operationally. But the principle matters: if the board micro-manages, it undermines the executive. If the board rubber-stamps everything the executive proposes, it fails in its oversight role. Neither extreme serves beneficiaries well.

5. Conflicts of interest must be identified, declared, and managed

A conflict of interest arises when a trustee's personal interests, or the interests of someone connected to them, could influence their judgement. This includes financial interests (a trustee's company bidding for a charity contract), loyalty conflicts (a trustee who also sits on the board of a partner organisation), and personal relationships.

The law requires conflicts to be declared and managed. In most cases, the conflicted trustee should withdraw from the relevant discussion and decision. The charity's governing document and conflict of interest policy should set out the procedure. Failure to manage conflicts properly is one of the most common triggers for Charity Commission intervention.

Common misunderstandings

"Trustees just need to turn up to meetings." Attendance is the minimum. Trustees are expected to read papers, ask questions, challenge assumptions, and take collective responsibility for decisions — including ones they voted against.

"The chair runs the charity." The chair leads the board, not the organisation. The CEO runs the charity. When chairs start acting as shadow CEOs, governance breaks down.

"We have a finance trustee, so the rest of us don't need to understand the accounts." Every trustee shares collective responsibility for the charity's finances. Having a finance lead is good practice, but it does not excuse the rest of the board from engaging with financial reports.

"Governance is just about compliance." Compliance is the floor, not the ceiling. Good governance includes strategic oversight, constructive challenge, and a genuine commitment to the charity's mission.

How it works in practice

In a well-governed charity, board meetings are structured around the charity's strategic priorities, not just operational updates. Trustees receive papers in advance, with clear recommendations from the executive. The board spends its time on decisions that matter — approving strategy, reviewing risk, scrutinising finances, and holding the executive to account on delivery.

Between meetings, trustees may sit on sub-committees (finance, audit, nominations, safeguarding) that do more detailed work and report back to the full board. The chair and CEO have a regular working relationship, with clear boundaries. New trustees go through an induction process and understand their legal duties from day one.

When things go wrong — a safeguarding incident, a financial shortfall, a reputational crisis — the board steps up. It ensures the executive is responding appropriately, communicates with regulators where required, and takes responsibility publicly. The worst governance failures happen when boards are absent in a crisis or, worse, try to cover things up.

What people disagree about

The balance of power between the board and the executive is genuinely contested. Some argue that boards should be more assertive and challenge executives harder; others worry that overbearing boards drive away talented leaders. There is no single right answer — it depends on the charity's size, stage, and circumstances. See Board vs Executive Power for a fuller discussion.

Whether trustees should be paid is another live debate. The default position in charity law is that trustees serve voluntarily, but there are provisions for payment in specific circumstances. Supporters of payment argue it would improve diversity and attract higher-calibre candidates; opponents worry it would undermine the ethos of voluntary public service. See Paying Trustees.

What to read next

FAQs

Can trustees be held personally liable?

Yes, though it is rare. Trustees can face personal liability if they act outside the charity's powers, fail to manage conflicts of interest, or cause the charity to breach the law through negligence. Trustee indemnity insurance is widely available and recommended by the Charity Commission.

How often should a board meet?

There is no legal minimum, but most charities hold four to six board meetings a year, with additional sub-committee meetings as needed. The Charity Governance Code emphasises that boards should meet often enough to discharge their responsibilities effectively.

What happens if a charity has poor governance?

The Charity Commission can open a regulatory compliance case, issue an official warning, appoint an interim manager, or in serious cases suspend or remove trustees. Poor governance is the most common underlying factor in Charity Commission investigations.

Do all charities need to follow the Charity Governance Code?

No — the Code is voluntary. But it is widely treated as good practice, and the Charity Commission references it regularly. Charities that choose not to follow it should be able to explain why their alternative approach is appropriate.